Virtualization by Davis: “Announcing: 2nd European App-V User Group Feb 8th 2013 in Amsterdam” plus 8 more |
- Announcing: 2nd European App-V User Group Feb 8th 2013 in Amsterdam
- Video: The Cost Benefits of Desktop Virtualization according to David Davis
- Ringing in the New Year with networking at Citrix Sales Kick Off!
- App-V 5: Catalog\Packages in Windows Profile
- Office 2013 release won't bridge gap between desktops, mobile devices
- App-V Client Offline Detection
- Running executables from within the APP-V 5 Shared Cache without the app ever having been "published"
- Citrix Support Webinar: November Webinar Q&A
- Comparison: VMware, Microsoft and Citrix virtualization Matrix
| Announcing: 2nd European App-V User Group Feb 8th 2013 in Amsterdam Posted: 10 Jan 2013 12:41 AM PST Login Consultants proudly presents the 2nd European App-V User Group Conference, which will take place on February 8th 2013 at Microsoft Netherlands HQ in Amsterdam! The first edition of the European App-V User Group in 2011, was a great success also due the overwhelming number of attendants. Over 100 people from 14 different countries took part in the event. In the 2013 edition we create a similar experience. The initiative is focused on bringing people from the App-V community together to learn about Microsoft App-V from the experts and share experiences and knowledge with each other. The events is sponsored by Login Consultants, but is free from commercial messaging and gives an independent insight in the Microsoft App-V market. There is a large number of App-V MVP's at the conference presenting on interesting topics. MVP's Falko Gräfe, Nicke Källén, Ment van der Plas, Ruben Spruijt, Jurjen van Leeuwen, Kalle Saunamäki and Rodney Medina have confirmed their attendance. Additionally also people from the Microsoft support team will be present. Click here for speakers info. The App-V User Group Conference is an excellent opportunity to learn about Microsoft App-V 5.0 from our presenters. Take a look at the agenda for all topics. If you would like to participate, please register on the website. The number of available seats is limited, so register in time.
Ment van der Plas    This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now | |
| Video: The Cost Benefits of Desktop Virtualization according to David Davis Posted: 09 Jan 2013 11:33 PM PST
On January 7, Brian Gammage, brought to our attention, through a blog post, an interesting video. David Davis, Virtualization and Cloud savvy at TrainSignal, Author and vExpert, discussed on the vmWare blog of a recent Google+ Hangout about cost and business benefits of Virtual Desktops. Davis explored the financial and technical benefits of desktop virtualization, still using the concept of cost saving as a trigger, he gave examples of how an organization can have centralized control and application consistency increasing security. Click here to view the embedded video. Labels: VDI, VMware          | |
| Ringing in the New Year with networking at Citrix Sales Kick Off! Posted: 09 Jan 2013 02:38 PM PST What a great way to start the New Year by going to Citrix Sales Kick Off (SKO) and really start in turbo gear in networking products. NetScaler and CloudBridge led the way in excitements at pre-SKO sessions. Here are some pics below. In addition, Sunil Potti (VP & GM NetScaler Product Group) and Chalan Aras (VP & GM, Cloud Bridge)' networking…  | |
| App-V 5: Catalog\Packages in Windows Profile Posted: 09 Jan 2013 10:22 AM PST Hi, one question about the App-V 5 windows user profile. I have some data in AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\AppV\Client\Catalog\Packages\IDs\UserDeploymentConfiguration.xml and UserManifest.xml. for every application. What are this files for? This two files (per application) are blowing up my user profiles. Do I need this files? Can I exclude them from the roaming profile? Thanks! Regards  This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now | |
| Office 2013 release won't bridge gap between desktops, mobile devices Posted: 08 Jan 2013 11:10 AM PST It's still difficult for IT to deliver Windows applications to mobile devices, and the Microsoft Office 2013 release doesn't go the extra mile.         | |
| App-V Client Offline Detection Posted: 09 Jan 2013 08:20 AM PST Hi Could anyone explain how the App-V 4.6 SP2 client determines whether it's in an online or offline state? Does it simply query the network adapter status or does it base it on whether it can find a streaming service (depending on client configuration)? If I stream an app to a client and then disconnect it from the network, I can launch the app offline no problem. If I reconnect it to the network and then rename the package folder in the content share, when I try to launch the application again I get an error. Would the same happen if the server was shut down completely or the management service wasn't running? In our environment we'll be using RTSP streaming from two App-V Management Servers in an NLB cluster. I believe I'm correct in saying that one of the limitations of Windows NLB is that clients will connect to the same cluster host indefinitely unless the host cluster membership changes? So in the eventuality of one of our two servers going down, we'll have to remove that server from the cluster while we restore it. What I'm trying to establish is what will happen to online clients trying to launch apps when a server is down (and we haven't yet removed it from the cluster). I hoped that if the application was already fully cached then if the client couldn't contact the streaming server it would just use the cached copy but this doesn't seem to be the case. Thanks in advance  This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now | |
| Posted: 09 Jan 2013 08:39 AM PST One of our goals is to be able to run APP-V apps from shortcuts placed in a network "APP Store". If we don't have to, we really don't want to install or publish the apps (via an APP-V server or SCCM). I did some experimentation and I found something that might work (see below).... Steps: I recognize that this method might not register the extensions but quite frankly the number of apps that will require registration will be few....and those we can publish. Does anyone see any problems with this approach? Is it unsupported by Microsoft? If it works, it greatly simplifies our app delivery process (just have to create shortcuts in the App Store). David W King  This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now | |
| Citrix Support Webinar: November Webinar Q&A Posted: 09 Jan 2013 07:18 AM PST Happy New Year everyone! Following on from our November 2012 Tech Support webinar which covered How to isolate and resolve issues in your XenApp & XenDesktop environment more rapidly, there was a series of questions asked during the session that we didn't get to answer. See the questions and answers below. BTW if you missed the webinar and would like to watch it on-demand, you…  | |
| Comparison: VMware, Microsoft and Citrix virtualization Matrix Posted: 09 Jan 2013 06:48 AM PST Andreas Groth, virtualization and cloud architect working for IBM has created a website comparing the virtualization features from VMware, Microsoft and Citrix. This week his virtualization matrix was updated to include Windows Server 2012 with its Hyper-V version 3.0 hypervisor and System Center 2012. The reference matrix, allows you to select and compare license specific capabilities of selected x86 server virtualization technologies, seperated by feature category (General, Management, Hypervisor and Extensions). The comparison is available at the following website: http://www.virtualizationmatrix.com/ Labels: Citrix, Comparison, Microsoft, VMware      |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Virtualization by Davis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario