Virtualization by Davis: “APP-V 5.0 DB Move” plus 4 more |
- APP-V 5.0 DB Move
- What's the best command-line shell: PowerShell vs. CMD vs. Bash
- Teradici PCoIP for RDS: What it means for VMware View shops
- appv 4.6 sp2 client application run error
- App-V 4.6 - Load Balanced Uses SMB Although HTTP is specified
| Posted: 05 Feb 2013 07:41 PM PST How we can move the APP-V 5.0 DB from one SQL 2012 server to another SQL 2012 Server. I did that successfully with the earlier version of APP-V, but was unable to implement in my environment as there is no MS document out there. Here what I did and what I am facing the issue:- 1) Backed up the Database on a SQL 2012 server having AppVManagement DB. 2) Restored it on another SQL 2012 server with just simple steps. Restoration was a success. 3) Installed the APP-V management Server pointing to the moved DB. 4) Installed the Publishing server successfully. 5) But when I tried to browse the APP-V 5.0 console I am receiving the following error:- I can connect to the DB Source (ODBC Source test) and I can ping the DB server too. Gaurav Ranjan    This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now |
| What's the best command-line shell: PowerShell vs. CMD vs. Bash Posted: 05 Feb 2013 01:32 PM PST PowerShell is a relative newcomer among command-line shells, but it's easy to see why it's so popular when you compare PowerShell vs. CMD and Bash.         |
| Teradici PCoIP for RDS: What it means for VMware View shops Posted: 05 Feb 2013 07:07 AM PST Customers can now use Teradici PCoIP in VMware View and Microsoft RDS environments, so how does this affect the vendors? And what about Citrix?   |
| appv 4.6 sp2 client application run error Posted: 05 Feb 2013 03:21 AM PST When I launch the application the following message appears The Application Virtualization Client could not launch LABS 1.0. This action is only valid for products that are currently installed. Error code: 4625DD4-1F701939-80070645 ant ideas what the cause could be?  This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now |
| App-V 4.6 - Load Balanced Uses SMB Although HTTP is specified Posted: 05 Feb 2013 02:49 AM PST Hi there, I have set up an App-V 4.6 SP1 based system with two management / streaming servers. I have load balanced these with a NetScaler using Direct Server Return for RTSP. The packages are delivered via RTSP and we have specified the OSD files to be delivered by HTTP (in the application settings and in the default content path in the management server). Now, although the server is refreshing successfully and the applications launch, when I point a client directly at one of the servers, it launches almost immediately (apps are pre-cached) but if I point it at the load balanced address, it takes around 10 secs, with the sys tray icon reporting 'Checking for updates...'. Having looked at netstat during the launch phase, the client is connecting to the management server on port 445 (presumably SMB) and then when pointing to the load balanced address it is stuck at sending a SYN on port 445. I presume that this is the cause of the delay in launching the application. Had anybody else seen this behaviour before? I'm not sure why it's trying to contact on SMB rather than HTTP (all the entries in the logs suggest HTTP) and even then, not sure why the NetScaler would not load balance the request as on 'ANY/ANY'. I might need DisableStrictNameChecking, I suppose (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/281308 - though I'm using 2008 R2) but I would prefer it not to use SMB at all. Regards, Steve  This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Virtualization by Davis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario